Category Archives: No-Damage-for_Delay

Federal District Court in Virginia Holds That Prime Contractor’s Payment Bond Surety Cannot Rely on No-Damages-For-Delay Clause in Subcontract to Limit Liability to Subcontractor Under Miller Act

United States v. John C. Grimberg Co., Case No. 1:16-cv-991, 2017 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 173362 (E.D. Virginia, October 19, 2017) John C. Grimberg (“Prime Contractor”) was awarded a contract (the “Prime Contract”) to design and complete certain improvements at the … Continue reading

Posted in Miller Act, No-Damage-for_Delay | Tagged , ,

Massachusetts Appellate Court Holds That No-Damages-for-Delay Clause Does Not Bar Claim for Schedule Compression and Affirms Award of Total Cost Damages

Central Ceilings, Inc. v. Suffolk Constr. Co., Inc., 2017 Mass App. Lexis 36 (March 29, 2017).  The Massachusetts State College Building Authority contracted with Suffolk Construction Company (“Suffolk”) to serve as the general contractor for the construction of dormitories at … Continue reading

Posted in No-Damage-for_Delay, Uncategorized | Tagged , , ,

Do No-Damage-for-Delay Clauses Bar Acceleration Claims?

Robert E. Heideck, Partner, & Kenneth A. Cushing, Associate, Pepper Hamilton LLP Time is money in construction, and project delays can cause contractors to incur substantial additional costs. To avoid responsibility for paying these costs, project owners often include a … Continue reading

Posted in Acceleration, No-Damage-for_Delay

Pennsylvania Commonwealth Court Explains and Applies Active Interference Exception to No Damage for Delay Clause

John Spearly Constr., Inc. v. Penns Valley Area Sch. Dist., 2015 Pa. Commw. LEXIS 337 (Pa. Commw. Ct. July 24, 2015) This action arose out of the construction of a biomass boiler system for the Penns Valley Area School Districts … Continue reading

Posted in No-Damage-for_Delay, Notice

Connecticut Supreme Court Construes “Active Interference” Exception to “No-Damage-for-Delay” Clause

C&H Electric, Inc. v. Town of Bethel, 312 Conn. 843, 2014 Conn. LEXIS 263 (Aug. 5, 2014) This dispute arose out of a project to renovate and build an addition at a high school in the Town of Bethel, Connecticut.  … Continue reading

Posted in Delay, No-Damage-for_Delay