Construction Law Review is an update and discussion of current trends in construction law, published by attorneys at Pepper Hamilton LLP with offices in Philadelphia, New York, Boston, Washington DC, Pittsburgh, Princeton, Wilmington, Silicon Valley, Orange County, Los Angeles, Harrisburg, Detroit, and Berwyn.
A Texas appellate court recently found that an out-of-state Oklahoma-based limited liability company was not subject to personal jurisdiction in Texas for alleged misappropriation of trade secrets claims.
In November 2009, Tropical Storm Ida hit El Salvador, causing flooding, landslides, and the destruction of homes, roads, bridges, schools, health clinics, and other infrastructure. The United States Agency for International Development (“USAID”) provided $25 million in funding to rebuild damaged infrastructure. USAID retained Defendant CDM International Inc. (“CDM”) to conduct studies and assessment for the construction of eight schools and one health clinic (the “Projects”) and to create preliminary designs and technical specifications for these Projects. These preliminary designs were intended to constitute at least thirty percent of final designs for the Projects. Relying on the preliminary designs created by CDM, Plaintiff Arco Ingenieros, S.A. de C.V. (“ARCO”) submitted bids to act as the design-build contractor for the Projects. USAID awarded the Projects to ARCO.
In 2016, Jet Commercial Construction, LLC (“Jet”) entered into a subcontract with SMJ General Construction, Inc. (“SMJ”) to supply materials and labor for the construction of a restaurant in Hawaii. The subcontract contained a dispute resolution provision that required the parties to first mediate any dispute and then submit it to arbitration if mediation was unsuccessful. It also included a choice-of-law and venue provision designating Oklahoma Law and the courts of Cleveland County, Oklahoma for any lawsuits pertaining to the Agreement’s enforcement.