Tag Archives: Universal City

Under California’s Prompt Payment Statute, a Direct Contractor May Not Withhold Retention From a Subcontractor Simply Because a Dispute Exists Between the Parties. To Allow Withholding, the Dispute Must Relate Directly to the Specific Retention Amount Due.

United Riggers & Erectors, Inc. v. Coast Iron & Steel Co., 2018 Cal. Lexis 3510 (May 14, 2018) This post was published in the August 16, 2018 issue of eNews published by National Association of Credit Management (NACM). In 2010, Universal … Continue reading

Posted in Prompt Payment Act | Tagged , , , ,