Fisk Elec. Co. v. DQSI, L.L.C., 2018 U.S. App. LEXIS 17914 (5th Cir., June 29, 2018)
DQSI, L.L.C., (“DQSI”) a general contractor, was hired by the Army Corps of Engineers (“Corps”) for a pump station construction project. Western Surety Company (“Western”) issued a Miller Act payment bond on DQSI’s behalf. DQSI hired Fisk Electric Company (“Fisk”) as subcontractor to perform electrical work on the project.
The project was delayed 464 days due, in part, to adverse weather conditions. Fisk asserted expenses due to the delay of over $400,000 against DQSI and submitted a Request for Equitable Adjustment (“REA”) to DQSI for the 464 days of delay.
Fisk sued DQSI and Western pursuant to the Miller Act. The parties then entered into a settlement agreement wherein Fisk would release DQSI for payment of approximately $55,000 and for DQSI’s agreement that it would submit the REA to the Corps and pursue it. Continue reading “Claimant Is Not Required to Conduct an Investigation Into the Veracity of the Representation to Prove Justifiable Reliance When Asserting a Fraudulent Inducement Claim Under the Miller Act”