Pritchett Controls, Inc. v. Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co., 2017 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 192182, 2017 WL 5591872 (D. Md. Nov. 21, 2017)
James W. Ancel, Inc. (“JWA”) was the prime contractor on a project for the Maryland Transit Authority in Baltimore. JWA subcontracted a portion of the work to Pritchett Controls, Inc. (“Pritchett”). The subcontract contained a forum selection clause requiring any disputes to be “brought in the District or County where Contractor’s principal office is located….” JWA’s principal office is located in Towson, Maryland, which sits in Baltimore County.
As required by Maryland’s Little Miller Act, JWA, as principal, executed a payment bond with Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co. (“Hartford”), as surety. This case involves Pritchett’s claim against Hartford for payment under the bond.
While performing its work on the project, Pritchett submitted twelve (12) payment applications to JWA totaling $744,799. It completed its work on March 16, 2017 but never received any payment for its work. On May 11, 2017, Pritchett submitted a notice of claim to Hartford. When that claim remained unpaid by July 25, 2017, Pritchett filed this action against Hartford in the United States District Court for the District of Maryland. Continue reading “Use of the Word “in” Indicates Geography; Use of the Word “of” Indicates Sovereignty: Federal District Court in Maryland Holds That Venue Is Proper in Federal Court in Maryland Where Forum Selection Clause Requires Action to be Brought “In the District or County” Where the Prime Contractor Is Located”