Tag Archives: unjust enrichment

Void Means Void – Municipal Contract That Did Not Conform to Statute Is Void and No Claim for Breach or Quasi-Contract or Unjust Enrichment Is Permitted

Aquatic Renovations Sys. v. Vill. of Walbridge, 2018 Ohio App. Lexis 1581 (April 13, 2018) This post was published on July 7, 2018 in The Pennsylvania Record. On May 2, 2012, Aquatic Renovations Systems, Inc. (“Aquatic”) entered into a contract … Continue reading

Posted in Government Contract | Tagged , , , , ,

U.S. District Court in Pennsylvania Denies GC’s Motion for Summary Judgment, Holding Issue of Fact Existed as to Whether GC’s Conduct During Settlement Discussions Waived Its Right to Rely on Claim Releases Submitted with Monthly Invoices

Lydon-Millwright, Inc. v. Ernest Bock & Sons, Inc. 2013 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 65019 (E.D. Pa. May 7, 2013) This case arises out of a construction project at the Philadelphia International Airport to install a baggage handling system. Bock was the … Continue reading

Posted in Breach of Contract | Tagged , , , , ,

U.S. District Court in New Jersey Holds Economic Loss Doctrine No Bar to General Contractor’s Delay Claims Against Architect

SRC Constr. Corp of Monroe v. Atl. City Housing Auth. 2013 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 47301 (D.N.J. April 2, 2013) The U.S. District Court for the District of New Jersey denied a defendant architect’s motion for summary judgment, holding that the … Continue reading

Posted in Breach of Contract, Termination | Tagged , , , , , ,

U.S. District Court in Missouri Holds Three-Month Suspension of Work Due to Work Safety Concerns Did Not Constitute Unreasonable Delay to Work Permitting Subcontractor to Terminate Subcontract Under AIA-Type Provision

SAK Construction of CA, L.P. v. PSC Industrial Outsourcing, L.P. 2012 U.S. Dist LEXIS 123473 (E.D. Mo. 2012) This action arose out of the Los Coyotes Water Reclamation Plant Interceptor Project in Los Angeles County, California. General Contractor, SAK Construction … Continue reading

Posted in Breach of Contract, Termination | Tagged , , , , ,

Pennsylvania Superior Court Clarifies Criteria for Unjust Enrichment Recovery by Subcontractor

Northeast Fence & Iron Works, Inc. v. Murphy Quigley Co. 933 A.2d 664, 2007 Pa. Super. LEXIS 3092 (Pa. Super. Ct. Sept. 18, 2007) The Pennsylvania Superior Court held that a subcontractor could recover on a theory of unjust enrichment … Continue reading

Posted in Payment dispute, Subcontract | Tagged , , ,